Bourgeoisie

those COLOTOX NOX is really revolutionary, on the other hand, and also between the leaders of the Nationalist Party (Menooal, etc. and the rank and file members. As a result there is not to be found in your article the perspective, which was later confirmed, of the divergence between the actions of the leaders of the nationalist Party who concluded a peace with Machado through the mediation of Guggenheim (and obviously under his pressure) and the actions of some of the provincial leaders and run and file members of the Party who are Qissatisfied with the policy of Kenocal and the other leaders and are fighting against Zachado (revolt in the Eastern Province of Cube. The same may be said of your estimate of the students. By calling all students the revolutionary nationalist youth. you do not make any distinction between that put RX tuz students who are really fighting against wachádo and against the treacherous leaders of the Nationalist party, and who are united in the left wing. and the bourgeois students and sons of landlords who consciously carry out in praotica the directives of the leaders of the Nationa list Party, not being tools In the bands of the bourgeois opposition as you write.
It is still more mistašen to state without differentiating between the economic interests of various groups in the Nationalist Party, that the nationalists as a whole were really simple tools in the hands of the bourgeois opposition. This contradicts your own statement that the nationalist leaders are themselves the bourgeois oppksition.
o) while you correctly emphasise the chief danger as the Right tendency in the CP of Cuba, which expresses itself in passivity, OLI Документы Советской эпохи http: sovdoc. susarchives. ru